![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Wow, Reece’s list was really solid compared to Geoffs, imo. I’m sure it just felt weird for Geoff that he would play a rule one way for tournaments, and then another way against a playtester. Its easy to say “if they didnt change it that’s how they meant it!” as a justification for the RAW answer here, so perhaps a better way to pass rules questions to the FAQ team would be helpful.īut for the rest of us, its often hard to distinguish RAW from RAI since we lack your insight, and the vast majority of us aren’t playing against playtesters. □ Instead of having an ITC faq like in the past, could there be a google form for rules questions that the ITC then passes on to the FAQ team, or better yet a google form set up by the GW team themselves? Just because this issue has made it through multiple FAQs without being touched on, I wonder if they simply were unaware of it. But is there any way to get rules questions to GW other than to post it on their FB page? Do you and Frankie ever pass rules questions on to the GW faq team post-playtesting? Understand if you’re not allowed to answer that. I understand that with your position with GW you’re not a fan of keeping an FAQ like in 7th, which makes sense as GW is doing a much better job now than they have in the past with FAQs. Because they wont if it changes the way they feel their army is “supposed” to play. In short, its not as easy as simply making your own FAQ and telling everyone “go by this end of discussion”. And now they are ones you have o personally defend because you made the rule. My point being, even putting it out there ahead of time still draws arguments. I was told once “You don’t even know what the INAT FAQ guys intended with that ruling.” I turned the FAQ to the front page where it listed all of our names and then pointed to my name badge and told them I was quite sure I know exactly what I meant when I wrote this. Most people simply can’t remember all the FAQ from all the armies they might face in a large event.Īdd to that, when its your own event FAQ and not GW official, some people even want to argue with your call at the table. One look at various forums like Dakka and you can see how often assumptions are made or questions are asked about things covered by current GW FAQ. People don’t always read or always remember. I can’t recall the number of times while judging at Adepticon that questions would be asked which were already covered in our FAQ. Both from within the group doing it with the time required and from without from the community itself and perceptions that you are “changing the game” from what “GW intended”. Starting and maintaining your own FAQ comes with its own challenges. We did this with the INAT FAQ, mostly used by Adepticon back in the day. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |